The Paradigm Of Conflict Theory - 1784 Words

Karl Marx, a famous German philosopher and sociologist, was a communist (Econfaculty). Which might turn some heads; however, his perspectives on certain issues are highly touted in the sociological world. He revolutionized the way in which people believe society is ran. So much so, that his most profound theory is one of the three major sociological paradigm that is studied in arguably every sociology class within the first week or two. Conflict Theory, created by Marx in the 1800s, is in the realm of macro level theories which relate more to larger scale issues as well as larger groups of people. Whereas the micro level of theories relate to very specific relationships – usually between individuals (OpenStax CNX. 2012). The paradigm of†¦show more content†¦The reason for this is simply that other people in the society cannot stand to see others benefit from a decision that gives them no beneficial outcome – even if it does not affect them in the slightest mann er negatively. However, in a society that is rallied behind each other, the group not being affected by the decision would be happy for the group that was affected because they understand that it benefits the society as a whole. As mentioned earlier, Karl Marx was a communist, and the same can be said for his system of government (Econfaculty). However, his principles and ideals emphasize equality. His ideologies on human rights, gender roles, healthcare, and lastly access to education are embedded with the notion that all parties deserve an equal stance and opportunity. Essentially, Marx is saying that every person should be able to get access to the most important of necessities with no priority for any party (Flow Psychology). A society must establish a common goal to work for which leads to the society to work together and continue to fortify that collective unit. By creating common goals, a society is establishing core values. With core values, a society is far more aware of wh at it needs to do to evolve into a proverbial well-oiled machine (Coser 1956). Arguably the most important reason as to why it is important for a unified society to establish core values is when conflict arises. In this perfectly imperfect world,Show MoreRelatedExamples Of Family Problems1401 Words   |  6 Pagesrelate to the three sociological paradigms; functionalist theory, conflict theory, and social interaction theory. Functionalist theory attributes family problems to social changes that prevent the family from performing its traditional functions. Conflict theory blames family problems on the strong feelings that being in a family arouses, such as love, pain, and conflict, and that the family provides an outlet for men to exploit women. Symbolic interaction theory focuses on the thoughtless nastinessRead MoreRealism Is The Most Convincing Paradigm For International Relations? Essay1579 Words   |  7 PagesWOULD YOU AGREE THAT REALISM IS THE MOST CONVINCING PARADIGM FOR IN TERNATIONAL RELATIONS? WHAT ARE THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF REALISM AS A THEORY FOR INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS? Realism has dominated international relations theory since emerging in the 1930’s. The era of state conflict lasting from the 1930’s to the end of the cold war in 1947, proved the perfect hostile environment to fit the largely pessimistic view of world politics. While many aspects of realism are still alive in InternationalRead MoreThe Scientific Science Of Science1304 Words   |  6 Pagescreativity. However, the scientific method is not a rigid system of pursuing measurable facts. It contains fallacies and biases. In testing hypotheses, performing observations, or reasoning inductively, science is undoubtedly flawed and erroneous. Paradigms, commonly seen as infallible and containing rather insignificant errors, contribute to many of the errors involved in scientific discoveries today. The liability of humans, including their imagination and creativity, could amount to errors in theRead MoreThe Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, And Conflict Theory1040 Words   |  5 Pagesinteracts with others, and how others influence the individual behaviors that impact society in a micro or macro way. The second theoretical framework is the conflict theory, it examines the rift between the rich and the poor and how it affects the quality of education, health care, and living condition of said group. Thirdly, the functionalist theory, which compares society to a system of interrelated parts, it’s a social system not just an individual. Each frame work plays part in the issue when an economyRead MoreTheories Of Secularization1029 Words   |  5 PagesThe Secularization Debates Early theories of secularization had originated in order to make note of the transfer of religious properties to the state. In this way, secularization was initially conceived as a means of labelling the transfer of things from the religious sphere of the European monastery to the non-monastic saeculum, or, secular sphere. This theory was subsumed into theories of modernization in order to argue that as the social differentiation of societies on the path to modernizationRead MoreTheoretical Frameworks Of Sociology And Sociological Perspective Essay918 Words   |  4 Pagesand how they study it. In this essay, I will be discussing theoretical frameworks of sociology; what is sociological perspective, how sociology differs from other disciplines such as history, anthropology or psychology, and how are sociological paradigms are used as ‘tools of the sociologist’ in their analyses of human societies. Firstly, what is sociological perspective? The sociological perspective is the point of view on human behaviour and how society influences people, and vice versa. TypicallyRead MoreThe Theory Of The Functionalist Paradigm869 Words   |  4 PagesThe Functionalist Paradigm is all about that which does and does not maintain a sense of social stability. It is the contention that social structure is the reason that everything is stable or perhaps not so stable, and that said structure is an attempt at maintaining a sort of societal symmetry. This paradigm argues that the best sort of society is a stable one, meaning any possible element that could be used toward that goal should be taken advantage of for the adaptability of the civilizationRead MoreSocial Conflict Theory Essay1294 Words   |  6 PagesThe social conflict paradigm is a theory based on society being a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Personal life experiences dictat e me to believe this theory is true. Discussion of the theory in question and how it pertains to myself will be covered in the paper. Social conflict can be seen all over the world we live in: in sports, politics and normal social engagements. The main point I have experienced with this theory would be the fact thatRead More Social Conflict and Inequality Essay1272 Words   |  6 PagesSocial Conflict and Inequality The social conflict paradigm is a theory based on society being a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Personal life experiences dictate me to believe this theory is true. Discussion of the theory in question and how it pertains to myself will be covered in the paper. Social conflict can be seen all over the world we live in: in sports, politics and normal social engagements. The main point I have experienced with thisRead MoreEssay Sociology676 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿ Identify the four major sociological theoretical paradigms. For each, what are the key tenets? How does each explain how society works? Functionalist Perspectives† also known as Structural-Functional Paradigm†- â€Å"The sociological approach that views society as a stable, orderly system. According to this perspective, a society is composed of interrelated parts, each of which serves a function and (ideally) contributes to the overall stability of the society. Societies develop social structures